I was too tired last night to stay up and watch either of the game. I was sure the Astros had the game under control. Ninth inning, two outs, two runners on with Pujols at bat. Are you kidding me? Do the words “intentional walk” mean anything to anyone?
————————————-
Now, more thoughts regarding yesterday‚Äôs post and comments. Here’s the thing. We don’t all have to be, as meowmix put it, “where you guys are at yet.” That’s the genius of relationships bound together by the blood of Jesus Christ.
Relationships bound together by the demands of church practice are doomed to failure. I say this for even in the movement which claims to be “of Christ” there is, and has been throughout the ages, great discord. Someone does not like the idea or opinion of another so another church is formed across town.
On the one hand, I’m glad people can “go somewhere else” to be in a group whose worship practices make them comfortable. On the other hand, imagine what it would be like if we just had to get along with each other and live with each other and worship with each other in love.
I don’t want to make light of a intensely sensitive issue but our movement is a movement which tolerates corporate divorce. God hates divorce (not the divorced person) because divorce is the result of discord and broken relationships. Two parties can no longer live together so they separate. Believers (members of the body of Christ) insist they can no longer worship (live) together so they separate.
Any church that continually seeks to advance the cause of “the movement” in the world is in serious trouble. Any church that continually seeks to advance the cause of Christ in the world is about kingdom business and will flourish. It is a mistake to equate our particular church practices and habits with the cause of Christ in this world. Certainly our doctrines have become dogmas.
We keep reading the instructions given to the 1st century church as the instructions given to the 21st century church. This, in my opinion, is not a faithful reading of the text. It is stretching the epistles and letters to the 1st century Christians in a manner in which the text never intended to stretch. Hold on a second. I’m not talking about moral issues. I’m not talking about tolerance for sinful behavior. Morality, ethics and the pursuit of godliness looks the same regardless of the century. Church practice will be different as has been true of language, vocabulary, style of singing, canon of songs, etc.
The core teaching for living for Christ is found in the teaching and example of Christ. Take a look at John 12:44-48 and determine the standard of judgment. Can you be the Christian or the church you need to be if you only had the words, teaching and example of Christ? Don’t dismiss this question. If we can’t be the person we need to be with only the words, teaching and example of Christ do we really have the courage to say we belong to Christ? If we can’t be the church we need to be if we only had the words, teaching and example of Christ do we really have the gall to say we are the church OF Christ?
One of the peculiar aspects of the living and active Word of God must be it‚Äôs ability to speak to the peculiarities of living in this century. Something that is living and active does not remain the same – it cannot remain the same. Living and active always means forward action. Dying and inactive always means backward action.
Equipped with the teaching and example of Jesus, the early believers were guided to be Jesus in their culture in their current age. This should never have changed. Each generation of believers needs to be asking “How can we live and practice our faith (personal and corporate) based on the example and teachings of Jesus for our current age and culture? To restore New Testament Christianity we would have to first restore the 1st century culture.
Each of us needs to be about presenting the good news of salvation through Jesus Christ that we may serve the purpose of God in our own generation.