<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anger Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randywray.com/2008/10/28/anger-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randywray.com/2008/10/28/anger-management/</link>
	<description>Serving The Purpose of God In This Generation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 19:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.marie.d</title>
		<link>http://randywray.com/2008/10/28/anger-management/#comment-4773</link>
		<dc:creator>l.marie.d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randywray.com/?p=926#comment-4773</guid>
		<description>sounds a bit like settling out of court.

if it is a look at motivation: what reason do we have to befriend (or even love) an enemy?  enemies are expendable (and easy to trade in for a newer or different model)... and well, they are enemies, for good reason!  does not feel too unnatural, does it? --and even if it does, i am not terribly motivated (for other reasons) to not let it go.  where is my motivation..or rather, whom?  the judge...fear of inhibiting my relationship (or inhibiting my righteousness?--if that fits someone.)

upon first reading that little &quot;court scenario&quot; i am automatically assuming that the &quot;You&quot; is in the right... what if the &quot;You&quot; is not in the right?  and the Judge is being fair?  the use of &quot;enemies&quot; is a perception not made by the Judge but by the &quot;You&quot;?  perhaps &#039;enemies&#039; is merely those with whom a barrier has been made (through an action) and &#039;friends&#039; is without said barrier.

and then i consider &quot;you will not leave there until you have paid everything you owe.&quot; --everything you owe...  take your humility now, in the presence of &#039;the enemy&#039;, or take it later when the impossibility seems greater?..

anywho... am not readily recalling &quot;the shrewd manager&quot; there are a few i tend to confuse..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds a bit like settling out of court.</p>
<p>if it is a look at motivation: what reason do we have to befriend (or even love) an enemy?  enemies are expendable (and easy to trade in for a newer or different model)&#8230; and well, they are enemies, for good reason!  does not feel too unnatural, does it? &#8211;and even if it does, i am not terribly motivated (for other reasons) to not let it go.  where is my motivation..or rather, whom?  the judge&#8230;fear of inhibiting my relationship (or inhibiting my righteousness?&#8211;if that fits someone.)</p>
<p>upon first reading that little &#8220;court scenario&#8221; i am automatically assuming that the &#8220;You&#8221; is in the right&#8230; what if the &#8220;You&#8221; is not in the right?  and the Judge is being fair?  the use of &#8220;enemies&#8221; is a perception not made by the Judge but by the &#8220;You&#8221;?  perhaps &#8216;enemies&#8217; is merely those with whom a barrier has been made (through an action) and &#8216;friends&#8217; is without said barrier.</p>
<p>and then i consider &#8220;you will not leave there until you have paid everything you owe.&#8221; &#8211;everything you owe&#8230;  take your humility now, in the presence of &#8216;the enemy&#8217;, or take it later when the impossibility seems greater?..</p>
<p>anywho&#8230; am not readily recalling &#8220;the shrewd manager&#8221; there are a few i tend to confuse..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwinwc</title>
		<link>http://randywray.com/2008/10/28/anger-management/#comment-4772</link>
		<dc:creator>cwinwc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randywray.com/?p=926#comment-4772</guid>
		<description>Maybe that restaurant owner in Agoura Hills should have become “quick friends” with the husband of the wife who fell out of one of his booths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe that restaurant owner in Agoura Hills should have become “quick friends” with the husband of the wife who fell out of one of his booths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

